THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RICHARD COTTER and HUGH TUCKER
__________
Appeal No. 93-4191
Application 07/831,6271
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, ELLIS and WEIMAR, Administrative
Patent Judges.
ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
1 through 16, which are all of the claims pending in the
application. Claims 1 and 6 are illustrative of the subject
1Application for patent filed February 6, 1992.
According to the appellants, this application is a
continuation of Application 07/506,938, filed April 10, 1990,
now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007