THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HANS RINK, MANFRED LIERSCH,
PETER SIEBER, WERNER RITTEL,
FRANCOIS MEYER, URSULA SEEMULLER,
HANS FRITZ, WALTER MARKI
and SEFIK ALKAN
__________
Appeal No. 94-2592
Application 07/707,2651
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, GRON, and ELLIS, Administrative
Patent Judges.
ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1 Application for Patent filed May 24, 1991. According
to applicants, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/186,828, filed April 27, 1988; which is a
continuation of Application 06/736,601, filed May 21, 1985,
which is a continuation-in-part of Application 06/673,951,
filed November 21, 1984, all abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007