Ex parte RINK et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 94-2592                                                          
          Application 07/707,265                                                      

          claim the eglin amino acid sequence alone or an “N-acetylated               
          eglin.”  An amendment inserting the phrase “N-acetylated”                   
          between “An” and “eglin” on line 1 of claim 34 would remedy                 
          this defect.                                                                
                                    Other Issues                                      
               In our review of the application we note that the                      
          examiner’s search of the prior art appears to have been                     
          limited to a word search of the term “eglin.”  We find no                   
          indication that the examiner searched (i) the protein data                  
          bases for the amino acid sequence of the claimed protein, or                
          (ii) the protein by its other name, hirudin.  Upon return of                
          this application to the corps, we suggest the examiner                      
          consider whether all the relevant data bases have been                      
          properly explored.                                                          


               The decision of the examiner is reversed.                              
                                      REVERSED                                        








                                          9                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007