THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte JULIAN WALLIS, KEVIN P. HALL, STEPHEN NEWMAN
and DIAN E. STEVENSON
________________
Appeal No. 94-3359
Application 07/941,5661
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before METZ, WEIFFENBACH and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
METZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's refusal to allow claims 1 through 12. Claims 13
through 17 stand withdrawn from consideration as claims directed
to the previously non-elected invention pursuant to a requirement
for restriction made by the examiner in Paper Number 5 (April 12,
Application for patent filed September 8, 1992.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007