Appeal No. 94-4342
Application No. 07/765,771
prior art relied upon by the examiner does not teach, nor
would have suggested, a step of implanting impurities
comprising “spacing said impurities laterally from said first
conductor by said lateral thickness of said sidewall
insulating film and thereby separating said impurities
laterally from said first conductor by a distance
corresponding to said predetermined vertical thickness of said
third insulating film.” Accordingly, the § 103 rejection of
claims 10, 11, 14 and 15 is reversed.
REVERSED
CAMERON WEIFFENBACH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHUNG K. PAK ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
CHARLES F. WARREN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007