THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 44
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte EDWARD L. SINOFSKY
_____________
Appeal No. 95-0065
Application 07/568,3481
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CALVERT, COHEN and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed August 15, 1990. According
to appellant, the application is a continuation of Application
07/257,760, filed October 14, 1988, now U.S. Patent 4,950,266,
issued August 21, 1990; which is a continuation of Application
07/014,990, filed February 17, 1987, abandoned; which is a
continuation of Application 06/761,188, filed July 31, 1985,
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007