Appeal No. 95-0792
Application No. 07/828,092
Claims 1 through 4, 7, 10, 12, 15, 17, 19 and 22 through 24
stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Gold.
Claims 6, 11 and 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Gold. Claim 26 stands rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Gold and Clark.
Claims 5 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Gold and Waksman. Claims 9, 14, 21 and 25
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Gold and Bishop.
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellant and the
Examiner, reference is made to the brief and answers for the3
respective details thereof.
OPINION
After a careful consideration of the record before us, we
will not sustain the 35 U.S.C. § 101 rejection of claims 1, 3
through 9, and 15 through 21, nor will we sustain the 35
U.S.C.
The Examiner responded to the brief with an Examiner's answer, mailed3
July 12, 1994. The Examiner mailed a supplemental Examiner's answer on June
11, 1996.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007