Appeal No. 95-0792
Application No. 07/828,092
to find that Gold teaches all of the limitations recited in
Appellant's claims and thereby we will not sustain the
Examiner's rejection.
Claims 6, 11 and 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Gold. Claim 26 stands rejected
under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Gold and Clark.
Claims 5 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Gold and Waksman. Claims 9, 14, 21 and 25
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Gold and Bishop. We note that for all of these
rejections of these dependent claims the Examiner relies on
Gold for the above limitations. Therefore, we will not
sustain these rejections for the same reason pointed out
above.
13
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007