THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HERMAN J. MAYEUX,
and EARL C. RUBY
__________
Appeal No. 95-0922
Application 08/082,9071
__________
HEARD: Jun. 8, 1998
__________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS, and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the refusal of the
examiner to allow claims 1 through 7 as amended subsequent to the
1Application for patent filed June 29, 1993. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation of Application
07/816,552, filed January 6, 1992, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007