Ex parte MAYEUX et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-0922                                                          
          Application No. 08/082,907                                                  


          final rejection.  These are all of the claims remaining in the              
          application.                                                                
               The subject matter on appeal relates to an almond shell                
          additive for well working fluids consisting essentially of                  
          certain particle size fractions of ground almond shells.  This              
          appealed subject matter is adequately illustrated by independent            
          claim 1 which reads as follows:                                             
               1. An almond shell additive for well working fluids, said              
          additive consisting essentially of ground almond shells                     
          consisting essentially of                                                   
               an intermediate particle fraction having a substantially               
          even particle size distribution between particle sizes of 100               
          microns and 2000 microns,                                                   
               a large particle fraction comprising at most about 5 percent           
          by weight of said additive and having a particle size greater               
          than 2000 microns, and                                                      
               a small particle fraction comprising at least 3 percent and            
          at most 20 percent by weight based on said additive and having a            
          particle size less than 100 microns.                                        
               The reference set forth below is relied upon by the examiner           
          in the rejections before us:                                                
          Borchardt           2,799,647           July 16, 1957                       
               Claims 1 through 7 are rejected under the second paragraph             
          of 35 U.S.C. § 112 for failing to particularly point out and                
          distinctly claim the subject matter which the appellants regard             
          as their invention.  According to the examiner, claim 1 is                  

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007