THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte HARRY K. PAULETT
_____________
Appeal No. 95-1112
Application 07/969,1211
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims
1-6 and 14-20 which are all of the claims remaining in the application. We affirm.
Application for patent filed October 30, 1992.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007