Ex parte BAUMGART et al. - Page 19




          Appeal No. 95-1217                                                          
          Application 08/039,674                                                      


          Vitronics Corp. v. Conceptronic, Inc., 90 F.3d 1576, 1582, 39               
          ordinary meaning unless the specification or file history                   
          clearly state that a special definition is intended.  Id.                   
               The Appellants’ specification does not define the term                 
          "distinct."  In ordinary usage, the term "distinct" can mean                
          "separate" or it can mean "not alike."  See Webster’s New                   
          Universal Unabridged Dictionary 534 (deluxe 2d. ed., Dorset &               
          Baber 1983).  Each of the neural networks (i.e., analysis                   
          chains) in Fukumizu are separate from the other neural                      
          networks.  If                                                               




          "distinct" could be interpreted as meaning "separate", then                 
          Fukumizu would disclose this limitation of claim 1.  However,               
          when the term "distinct" in claim 1 is read in light of the                 
          other language of the claim, and in light of the                            
          specification, it must be interpreted as requiring that each                
          analysis chains is not like the other analysis chains.                      





                                         19                                           





Page:  Previous  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007