Ex parte JOSEPH et al. - Page 1




                                                        Paper No. 27                    

               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                             
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                    
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                      
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                         
                                    _______________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                            
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _______________                                     
                               Ex parte JOHN V. JOSEPH,                                 
                         MARK B. SHADOWENS, CRAIG W. THOMPSON                           
          and JOHN CHUNG-LIN CHEN                                                       
                                    ______________                                      
                                  Appeal No. 95-1599                                    
                               Application 08/062,492 1                                 
                                    _______________                                     
                                    ON BRIEF                                            
                                    _______________                                     
          Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent               
          Judges.                                                                       
          HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge .                                       
                                                                                       


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                    
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims                     
          8 through 13 and 19 through 32.                                               

               Application for patent filed May 14, 1993.  According to appellants,1                                                                       
          this application is a continuation of Application 07/526,215, filed May 21,   
          1990. (Abandoned).                                                            

                                           1                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007