Ex parte WATANABE et al. - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        
                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                                                             
                 (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                                                               
                 (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                             



                                                                                                           Paper No. 37                                 



                                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                        

                                                                _____________                                                                           

                                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                         
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                           
                                                                _____________                                                                           

                                                       Ex parte SHOZO WATANABE                                                                          
                                                                        and                                                                             
                                                            KEITARO KAMEYAMA                                                                            
                                                                _____________                                                                           
                                                           Appeal No. 95-1987                                                                           
                                                       Application 08/076,4751                                                                          
                                                               ______________                                                                           
                                                      HEARD:  October 15, 1998                                                                          
                                                              _______________                                                                           




                          1Application for patent filed June 14, 1993.  According                                                                       
                 to appellants, the application is a continuation of Applica-                                                                           
                 tion 07/533,504, filed June 5, 1990, abandoned.                                                                                        
                                                                           1                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007