Ex parte LEWIS et al. - Page 6




          Appeal No. 95-2638                                                          
          Application 08/022,174                                                      


          subject matter defined in claims 1 through 5 including quick                
          cooking dehydrated vegetable pieces having incorporated                     
          therein alkali metal carboxylate at a concentration of 1 to 4%              
          by weight.                                                                  
               The examiner's rejection of claims 1 through 5 under 35                
          USC § 102(b) as anticipated by Lioutas is reversed.                         




          35 USC § 103                                                                
               We have carefully considered the examiner's rejection of               
          claims 1 through 9 and 14 through 17 under 35 USC § 103 as                  
          unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Lioutas, Lewis,               
          and Bevan.  We think it clear that neither Lewis nor Bevan                  
          cure the deficiency of Lioutas which has been discussed above               
          in conjunction with the rejection under 35 USC § 102.                       
               That is, even if Lioutas, Lewis, and Bevan were combined               
          in the manner proposed by the examiner, the combination would               
          not have led a person having ordinary skill in the art to the               
          claimed product or process of making that product where alkali              
          metal carboxylate is present at a concentration of 1 to 4                   
          percent by weight.  The proposed modification of Lioutas, per               
                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007