Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex parte GOTO et al. - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 1998 > Ex parte GOTO et al. - Page 1

                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 38              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                              Ex parte YOSHIHISA GOTO,                                
                       TOSHIHIKO TSUTSUMI, TOSHIAKI TAKAHASHI,                        
                                and TAKATOSHI SAGAWA                                  
                                     __________                                       
                                 Appeal No. 95-2881                                   
                               Application 07/988,0371                                
                                     __________                                       
                                HEARD: Dec. 9, 1998                                   
                                     __________                                       

          Before SOFOCLEOUS, GARRIS, and PAK, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   



               Application for patent filed December 9, 1992.1                                                                     
          According to appellants, this application is a continuation of              
          Application 07/381,400, filed July 18, 1989.                                
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007