Appeal No. 95-2936
Application 07/887,040
Marzullo 4,875,965 Oct. 24, 1989
O'Dea 4,924,805 May 15, 1990
Muisener 5,006,233 Apr. 9, 1991
Claims 9 through 12, 18 and 22 through 24 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Marzullo in view of Lupkas, O'Dea and Muisener.
Claim 13 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Marzullo in view of Lupkas, O'Dea and Muisener
as applied in the paragraph above, further taken in view of Katz.
Claim 14 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Marzullo in view of Lupkas, O'Dea and Muisener
as applied in claims 10, 11 and 23 above, further in view of
McCausland.
Rather than reiterate the examiner's full statement
of the above-noted rejections and the conflicting viewpoints
advanced by the examiner and appellant regarding the rejections,
we make reference to the examiner's answer (Paper No. 14, mailed
November 2, 1994) for the examiner's complete reasoning in
support of the rejections, and to appellant's brief (Paper
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007