THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KRISTINA M. BEATTY
____________
Appeal No. 95-2990
Application 08/147,9071
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before and THOMAS, HAIRSTON and CARMICHAEL, Administrative
Patent Judges.
CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Application for patent filed November 3, 1993.1
According to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/969,557 filed October 30, 1992, which is a
continuation of Application 07/750,955 filed August 28, 1991,
both abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007