Appeal No. 95-2990
Application 08/147,907
computer displays in staff notation the music being played by
the computer.
We disagree with the examiner’s finding that Sasaki
suggests displaying an indicium on a computer screen to elicit
a note from an instrument player. Because that finding is at
the heart of the rejection and the other references do not
overcome the deficiency, we will not sustain the rejection of
claim 24.
CONCLUSION
The rejection of claim 25 is sustained. The
rejection of claims 22-24 is not sustained.
-8-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007