Ex parte CHRYSAM et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 95-3328                                                          
          Application 07/794,764                                                      


          Structure, and Properties of Interesterified Soybean Oil-Soy                
          Trisaturate Blends,” Journal of the American Oil Chemists’                  
          Society, vol. 54, pp. 408-413 (1977).                                       
          Miller et al. (Miller), “High-Temperature Stabilities of Low-               
          Linolenate, High Stearate and Common Soybean Oils,” Journal of              
          the American Oil Chemists’ Society, vol. 65, pp. 1324-1327                  
          (1988).                                                                     
               Claims 1, 2, and 4 through 24 stand rejected under 35                  
          U.S.C.                                                                      
          § 103 as being unpatentable over List in view of Miller.  We                
          reverse.                                                                    
                                       OPINION                                        
               It is apparent from the independent claims set forth                   
          above, that all of the claims on appeal require that the fat                
          product have a solids content of at least 4% or 6% at 80EF,                 
          and at least 1% at 92EF.                                                    
               However, the examiner states on p. 4 of the Answer that                
               It is appreciated that the particular melting properties               
               of the product are not recited [in the applied prior art]              
               however, with regard to claims 1 and 2, these are                      
               preamble limitations carrying no weight in product                     
               claims.                                                                
               We find that this reading of the referenced limitations                
          out of the claims constitutes clear error on the part of the                
          examiner.  In re Geerdes, 491 F.2d 1260, 1262, 180 USPQ 789,                

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007