THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte THOMAS T. FU
__________
Appeal No. 95-3451
Application No. 08/097,5881
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before GARRIS, WARREN and ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection
of claims 9 through 11, 13 through 15, 18 through 24 and 30
through 33. The only other claims remaining in the
application have been allowed by the examiner.
Application for patent filed July 26, 1993. According1
to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/874,668, filed April 27, 1992, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007