THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte SIDDHARTHA DAS, HARRY H. FUJIMOTO
and HENRY GAW
________________
Appeal No. 95-3936
Application 08/135,3241
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before CAROFF, METZ and HANLON, Administrative Patent Judges.
METZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's refusal to allow claims 10 and 12 through 14. The
Application for patent filed October 13, 1993. The1
instant application is a continuation of Serial Number
07/887,408, filed on May 19, 1992, and now abandoned; said
abandoned application is a continuation of Serial Number
07/682,574, filed on April 8, 1991, and now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007