THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte TUKARAM K. HATWAR AND DOUGLAS G. STINSON
________________
Appeal No. 95-4066
Application 07/963,1891
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before METZ, WEIFFENBACH and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
METZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's refusal to allow claims 1, 4, 6, 7, 10, 12, 13, 15,
17 and 20, all the claims in this application.
Application for patent filed October 19, 1992.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007