Ex parte BERRY et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 95-4356                                                          
          Application 08/133,821                                                      



          Fleming et al. (Fleming)       5,140,677         Aug. 18, 1992              
          (filed May 11,                                                              
          1990)                                                                       

          "Interactive Information Retrieval System: Sub-Icon                         
          Selection," IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Vol. 28, No.                 
          12, May 1986, pages 5395-5396 (IBM).                                        
          Systems Application Architecture, Common User Access Advanced               
          Interface Design Guide, Copyright IBM Corporation, June 1989,               
          pages 103-115 (IBM Guide).                                                  

          Claim 16 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                      
          paragraph, for failing to particularly point out and                        
          distinctly claim the invention.  Claims 16-27 stand rejected                
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness the                      
          examiner offers Fleming in view of IBM and the IBM Guide with               
          respect to claim 16 and adds Berry with respect to claims 17-               
          27.                                                                         
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the                       
          examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for                 
          the respective details thereof.                                             
          OPINION                                                                     
          We have carefully considered the subject matter on                          
          appeal, the rejections advanced by the examiner, the arguments              

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007