Appeal No. 95-4390
Application08/066,273
representative of the identified portion of the original image
with the modified image data to generate enhanced image data
representative of an enhanced image; and
recording means for receiving the enhanced image data
from the processing means and producing a hard copy of the
enhanced image.
The examiner relies on the following reference:
Obata et al. (Obata) 5,083,287 Jan. 21, 1992
Claims 7-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103. As
evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Obata taken alone.
The final rejection of claims 7-12 under 35 U.S.C. § 101 was
withdrawn by the examiner [answer, page 2].
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellant or the
examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for
the respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejection advanced by the examiner and the
evidence of obviousness relied upon by the examiner as support
for the rejection. We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into
consideration, in reaching our decision, the appellant’s
arguments set forth in the brief along with the examiner's
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007