THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte TSUGUNORI KONAKAWA
__________
Appeal No. 95-4616
Application 08/200,9321
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before CALVERT, MEISTER and ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
The following claims of record in this application are before us on appeal:
10-18, 24, 26-28, 33, 34, 49-53, 58-66, 73-79, 81-89, 93-98 and 105.
The appellant's invention is directed to a reed type valve arrangement for a
reciprocating machine. The subject matter before us on appeal is illustrated by
reference to claim 10, which can be found in an appendix to the Appeal Brief.
1Application for patent filed February 22, 1994. According to the appellant, the
application is a continuation of Application 07/994,931, filed December 22, 1992,
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007