Appeal No. 95-5063
Application 08/058,612
and fail to convince us of the obviousness of claims 12 and
13. The obviousness rejection of claims 12 and 13 is
reversed.
The obviousness rejection of claims 14 and 15 is reversed
because the aircraft engine thrust warning system disclosed by
Stockton does not cure the noted shortcomings in the teachings
of Graham.
DECISION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 10 and 11
under the second paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112, and claims 12
through 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
Kenneth W. Hairston )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007