Paper No. 36
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte MASAAKI KAMIYA,
KENJI AOKI and
NAOTO SAITO
______________
Appeal No. 96-0161
Application 08/006,152 1
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before GARRIS, WEIFFENBACH and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges .
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge .
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1 through 28, which are all of the claims in
the application.
Application for patent filed January 19, 1993. According to1
applicants, this application is a continuation of Application 07/821,318,
filed January 13, 1992 (abandoned); which is a continuation of application
07/565,221, filed August 10, 1990 (abandoned).
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007