THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SHIGEYUKI SASAKI, TADAKATSU NAKAJIMA,
NORIYUKI ASHIWAKE, YASUO OHSONE, TOSHIO HATADA,
TOSHIKI IINO, AKIO IDEI and KENICHI KASAI
____________
Appeal No. 96-0274
Application No. 08/103,2271
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before Thomas, Martin and Carmichael, Administrative Patent
Judges.
Carmichael, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-
20, which constitute all the claims remaining in the
application.
1Application for patent filed August 9, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007