Ex parte LEE et al. - Page 3




                     Appeal No. 96-0289                                                                                                                                                
                     Application 07/935,301                                                                                                                                            


                     Fujita  2                                                        64-77141                                   Mar. 23, 1989                                         
                     (Japanese Kokai)                                                                                                                                                  



                                                                             THE REJECTIONS                                                                                            

                                Claim 19 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Fujita.  Claims 1, 2                                                         

                     and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being obvious over Fujita in view of Choi and                                                                      

                     Takemae.                                                                                                                                                          

                                                                                    OPINION                                                                                            

                                We have carefully considered all of the arguments advanced by appellants and the examiner                                                              

                     and agree with the examiner that the invention recited in appellants’ claim 19 is anticipated by Fujita and                                                       

                     that the invention recited in appellants’ claims 1, 2 and 19 would have been obvious to one of ordinary                                                           

                     skill in the art at the time of appellants’ invention over the applied references.  Accordingly, the                                                              

                     aforementioned rejections will be affirmed.                                                                                                                       

                                                         Rejection of claim 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)                                                                                

                                Fujita discloses a method for blowing a fusible metal link, which is positioned over a silicon                                                         

                     nodule and polysilicon layer (Fig. 2(c)), by passing an electric current through the link so as to melt the                                                       

                     link (page 5).  The silicon nodule is formed by passing a large electric current through a metallic wiring                                                        

                     layer (11) positioned over a polysilicon layer (12) (page 5).  The heat generated causes the polysilicon                                                          

                                2Citations herein are to the English translation of this reference, which is of record.                                                                
                                                                                          3                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007