Ex parte GLEIM et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-0322                                                          
          Application 08/123,920                                                      

          current component of the alternating signal is outside given                
          values.  Claims 20, 21 and 23 are the only independent claims.              





               Representative claim 20 is reproduced below:                           
               20.  A method for monitoring an alternating signal                     
          comprising the steps of: modifying said alternating signal into             
          a modified signal having characteristics over time that are a               
          measure for a mark-to-space ratio and/or for a direct-current               
          component present in said alternating signal; comparing said                
          modified signal with reference signals and results establishing             
          said mark-to-space ratio and/or direct-current component of said            
          alternating signal; constructing a control signal from said                 
          reference signals and a smoothed pulsed signal, said control                
          signal being a measure of a potential malfunction when said mark-           
          to-space ratio exceeds a given value and/or said direct-current             
          component of said alternating signal is outside specifically                
          given values; said alternating signal controls means having                 
          activities decreased to standby in response to said results of              
          said comparing step.                                                        


                                       Opinion                                        
               We will not sustain the rejection of claims 12, 13, 16, 17             
          and 20-23 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Denk.            
               Anticipation is established only when a single prior art               
          reference discloses, either expressly or under the principles of            
          inherency, each and every element of the claimed invention.  In             
          re Spada, 911 F.2d 705, 708, 15 USPQ2d 1655, 1657 (Fed. Cir.                

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007