Ex parte OLNOWICH - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 96-0546                                                                                                                     
                 Application No. 07/947,010                                                                                                             



                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                           
                          This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 14                                                                       
                 through 22.  In view of appellants’ withdrawal of the appeal                                                                           
                 of claims 17 and 19  (Brief, page 1), claims 14 through 16, 182                                                                                                    
                 and 20 through 22 remain before us on appeal.                                                                                          
                          The disclosed invention relates to a bufferless switching                                                                     
                 network.                                                                                                                               
                          Claim 14 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it                                                                     
                 reads as follows:                                                                                                                      
                          14. A bufferless switching apparatus comprising:                                                                              
                          a plurality of switch inputs and a plurality of switch                                                                        
                 outputs;                                                                                                                               
                          connection means for establishing a requested                                                                                 
                 communication path between any one of the switch inputs and                                                                            
                 any one of the switch outputs in response to a connection                                                                              
                 request included in a data message received at said any one of                                                                         
                 the switch inputs, said communication path for transmitting                                                                            
                 the data message received at said any one of the switch inputs                                                                         
                 to said any one of the switch outputs;                                                                                                 
                          said connection means including asynchronous connection                                                                       
                 means for establishing asynchronously a plurality of                                                                                   
                 simultaneously active requested communication paths between a                                                                          

                          2The examiner’s contentions (Answer, page 6) to the                                                                           
                 contrary notwithstanding, the withdrawal of claim 17 is not an                                                                         
                 admission by appellants that the claim “is properly rejected                                                                           
                 by the prior art of record.”                                                                                                           
                                                                           2                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007