THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RICHARD A. COMROE, ROBERT W. FURTAW
ARUN SOBTI and JOHN E. MAJOR
__________
Appeal No. 96-1386
Application 08/030,9371
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges.
FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
As originally filed, this patent application contained 19
claims. Claims 15 and 16 were allowed in in the examiner’s
rejection (Paper No. 8) dated May 25, 1994. Claims 13 and 14
were canceled by appellant in a § 116 amendment (Paper no. 13½)
Application for patent filed March 12, 1993.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007