Ex parte MENGEL - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-1739                                                          
          Application 08/227,301                                                      


               b) attaching planar open cell foam having a uniform cross              
          section and comprising randomly oriented contractible cells                 
          either directly to the front side of the cone or to the frame               
          in front of the cone to enclose a volume of air between the                 
          front side of the piston loudspeaker and the open cell foam                 
          such that the open cell foam is energizable responsive to                   
          activation of the piston loudspeaker;                                       
               c) activating the piston loudspeaker at a low frequency                
          such that all points of the cone surface move in phase to                   
          acoustically move air towards the open cell foam;                           
               d) engaging the foam with the acoustically moved air such              
          that the contractible cells contract and the foam becomes                   
          elastically stiff, and thereby energizing the foam with the                 
          acoustically moved air such that the foam acoustically                      
          radiates one hundred and eighty degrees out of phase with                   
          respect to the front side of the piston loudspeaker and in                  
          phase with respect to the rear side of the same piston                      
          loudspeaker to thereby avoid short circuit cancellation of                  
          acoustical energy.                                                          

          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Broadley                        3,187,832         June 08,                  
          1965                                                                        
          Long                            3,735,336         May  22,                  
          1973                                                                        
          Pohlmann et al. (Pohlmann)      4,161,995         July 24,                  
          1979                                                                        
          King                            4,387,787         June 14,                  
          1983                                                                        
          Claims 25 and 28-35 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                        
          112, second paragraph, for failing to particularly point out                
          and distinctly claim the invention.  Claim 25 also stands                   


                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007