Ex parte OLSON - Page 8




          Appeal No. 96-1819                                                          
          Application 08/112,151                                                      


               In summary:                                                            
               The examiner’s rejection of claims 8-10 under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 103 is reversed.                                                          
               New rejections of claims 8-10 have been made under 35 U.S.C.           
          § 112, second paragraph.                                                    
               A new rejection of claims 8 and 10 has been made under 35              
          U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph.                                              
               This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to           
          37 CFR § 1.196(b)(amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final rule             
          notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203 Off.              
          Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)).  37 CFR              
          § 1.196(b) provides that, “A new ground of rejection shall not be           
          considered final for purposes of judicial review.”                          
               37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellant, WITHIN             
          TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of              
          the following two options with respect to the new ground of                 
          rejection to avoid termination of proceedings (§ 1.197(c)) as to            
          the rejected claims:                                                        
                    (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of the claims                 
               so rejected or a showing of facts relating to the                      
               claims so rejected, or both, and have the matter                       
               reconsidered by the examiner, in which event the                       
               application will be remanded to the examiner. . . .                    



                                          8                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007