Appeal No. 96-1904
Application 08/164,854
fail to particularly point out and distinctly claim any
structure.
Claims 1 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
102(b) as being anticipated by each of McCall, Lahr, Rader,
and Goldstein.
Claims 3 through 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 21, and
22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over McCall, Lahr, Rader, and Goldstein in view
of the IBM reference and Leipzig.
Claims 10, 13, 16, and 19 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over McCall, Lahr,
Rader,
and Goldstein in view of the IBM reference and Leipzig, as
applied immediately above, further in view of Louis and
Hagelstein.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007