Ex parte BLISH - Page 22




          Appeal No. 96-1904                                                          
          Application 08/164,854                                                      



                    The examiner applies the respective teachings of                  
          Louis and Hagelstein which reflect the use of audible sounds                
          and tones                                                                   
          relative to keyboard operation.  In particular, Hagelstein                  


          teaches the use of a sound (wrong musical note) when a wrong                
          letter is typed.  This latter disclosure is somewhat akin to                
          the typical and common circumstance with known computers                    
          whereby a sound is generated indicating to an operator that an              
          action cannot be taken while another action is pending and                  
          therefore required to be taken.                                             


                    Considering the overall knowledge and level of skill              
          in the art at the time of appellant’s invention, it is                      
          apparent to us that generating an appropriate tone in the                   
          modified keyboard as discussed in the affirmed rejection of                 
          claims 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, and 21 would have been                 
          obvious to one having ordinary skill in the computer keyboard               
          art.  As we see it, the incentive on the part of one having                 
          ordinary skill in the art for including the feature of tone                 

                                         22                                           





Page:  Previous  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007