THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JOACHIM GRIFKA
__________
Appeal No. 96-2454
Application No. 08/052,7371
__________
HEARD: March 2, 1998
__________
Before CALVERT, ABRAMS and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally
rejecting claims 1 through 6 and 8 through 20, which constitute
all of the claims of record in the application. 2
1Application for patent filed April 27, 1993.
2Paper No. 7 erroneously states that claims 1 through 20 are
finally rejected. The Examiner’s Answer (Paper No. 18) is
correct, however.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007