Appeal No. 96-2454
Application No. 08/052,737
have recognized this as a requirement in order for the device to
function in the intended manner. Such a double pivoting
attachment, which is necessary in this type of device, is
graphically illustrated in Figure 4 of the Brooks patent, cited
by the appellant in the Information Disclosure Statement (Paper
No. 2).
The rejection is not sustained.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
IAN A. CALVERT )
Administrative Patent Judge)
)
)
)
NEAL E. ABRAMS ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
JOHN P. McQUADE )
Administrative Patent Judge)
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007