Ex parte ISHIBASHI - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-2528                                                          
          Application 08/011,202                                                      


          Yamada (Japanese Koaki)2           1-225 175                                
          Sept. 8, 1989                                                               
          Onda et al. (Onda), “Striped Channel Field Effect Transistors               
          With A Modulation Doped Structure”, IEDM-89, pp. 125-128 (Dec.              
          1989).                                                                      
               Claims 1-4 stand provisionally rejected under the                      
          judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double                      
          patenting as being unpatentable over a copending application.               
          Claims 1-4 also stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                
          paragraph, as being indefinite. Finally, claims 1-4 stand                   
          rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                                    
          § 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon                
          Yamada in view of Onda as to claims 1-3, with the addition of               
          Abrokwah as to claim 4.                                                     
               Rather than repeat the positions of the appellants and                 
          the examiner, reference is made to the briefs and the answer                
          for the respective details thereof.                                         
                                       OPINION                                        




               Our understanding of this reference is based upon by a translation2                                                                     
          provided by the Scientific and Technical Information Center of the Patent and
          Trademark Office.  A copy of the translation is enclosed with this decision.

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007