Appeal No. 96-2724 Application 08/343,201 Figure 4 is described as having a star-shaped pouch (30) which carries a mixture of sand (32) and oil (34). There is no indication in the specification as to how much of the pouch is filled with oil, although it appears from Figure 4 that only about half of the pouch is filled with the mixture. Thus, the originally filed specification leaves us in the dark as to what the new claim language "substantially free of liquid" is intended to mean. Appellant's attempt in Paper No. 23 to be a post-hoc lexicographer and thereby explain the meaning of this language added to claim 10, is unavailing, since it is the original disclosure itself which must provide support and antecedent basis for this language. Finding no clear understanding of exactly what the limitation of claim 10 regarding the sealed compartment being "substantially free of liquid" means, we find this claim and the claims which depend therefrom to be indefinite. To summarize, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 4 through 7 and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. However, as provided for in 37 CFR § 1.196(b), a new rejection of the appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, has been entered by this panel of the Board. 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007