Ex parte MEGER - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-3037                                                          
          Application No. 08/252,474                                                  


               The appellant's invention is directed to a railgun using a             
          composite insulator.  The subject matter before us on appeal is             
          illustrated by reference to claim 1, which reads as follows:                
               1.   A railgun comprised of:                                           
               a plurality of rails;                                                  
               a laminated insulator comprised of laterally positioned                
          layers of insulation material separated by a conducting layer;              
               said insulator being located between the rails so as to form           
          a bore;                                                                     
               an armature located within the bore; and                               
               means for generating a current to be applied to the armature           
          through the rails thereby causing a magnetic field to be                    
          generated capable of accelerating the armature along the bore.              

                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
               The references relied upon by the examiner to support the              
          final rejection are:                                                        
          Creedon                  4,681,015                Jul. 21, 1987             
          Bauer                    5,375,504                Dec. 27, 1994             
          Thio et al. (Thio), “On Some Techniques To Achieve Ablation Free            
          Operation Of Electromagnetic Rail Launchers,” Conf. Proc., 6th              
          Symp. on Electromag. Launch Tech., Austin, TX (April 28-30,                 
          1992).                                                                      

                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 1, 5, 7, 8 and 10-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.             
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by Thio.                                      

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007