Appeal No. 96-3037
Application No. 08/252,474
SUMMARY
The rejection of claims 1, 5, 7, 8 and 10-12 as being
anticipated by Thio is sustained.
The rejection of claims 1, 2, 6-8 and 10-12 as being
anticipated by Bauer is not sustained.
The rejection of claim 3 as being unpatentable over Bauer in
view of Creedon is not sustained.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge)
)
)
)
LAWRENCE J. STAAB ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD )
Administrative Patent Judge)
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007