Appeal No. 96-3628
Application 08/050,029
fiber optic networks and the examiner has convinced us of none.
We have sustained the rejection of claim 3 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph, but we have not sustained the rejection of claims 1 and 3 through 9 under 35
U.S.C. § 103. Accordingly, the examiner’s decision is affirmed-in part.
No period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be
extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
JOHN C. MARTIN ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
INTERFERENCES
)
)
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007