THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JEHOSHUA S. ROTSTAIN
__________
Appeal No. 96-3767
Application 07/970,2601
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before THOMAS, FLEMING, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1, 4, 5, and 10 to 32, which constitute
all the claims remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed November 2, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007