Ex parte ROTSTAIN - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-3767                                                          
          Application 07/970,260                                                      



               Representative claim 1 is reproduced below:                            
               1.  A method of performing division operations, including              
          the following steps:                                                        
               inputting a dividend and a divisor;                                    
               determining whether a first value is present in a cache                
          memory, the first value representing the value of the divisor;              
               reading a second value from the cache memory as a reciprocal           
          of the divisor, the second value corresponding to the first value           
          and representing the reciprocal of the first value, and finding             
          the quotient by multiplying the second value and the dividend, in           
          the event that the first value is determined to be present in the           
          cache memory; and                                                           
               finding the quotient of the dividend and the divisor by                
          determining a reciprocal of the divisor and multiplying the                 
          reciprocal and the dividend, in the event that the first value is           
          determined to not be present in the cache memory.                           

               The following references are relied on by the examiner:                
          Sierra                   3,648,038           Mar.  7, 1972                  
          Richardson               5,260,898           Nov.  9, 1993                  
                                        (filing date Mar. 13, 1992)                   

               All claims on appeal stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.             
          As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon Richardson             
          alone as to claims 10 to 12 and 20 to 22.  As to claims 1, 4, 5,            






                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007