Ex parte ROSE et al. - Page 16




          Appeal No. 96-3923                                                          
          Application 08/309,790                                                      


          unpatentable over Fuller in view of Rose and claims 8-11 as                 
          being unpatentable over Fuller in view of Ray.                              
               In summary:                                                            
               The rejections of claims 15-28 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                  
          first and second paragraphs, are reversed.                                  
               The rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1 and 5-7               
          as being unpatentable over Fuller in view of Rose and claims                
          1-4 as being unpatentable over Fuller in view of Ray are                    
          reversed.                                                                   
               The rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 8 and 12-               
          14 as being unpatentable over Fuller in view of Rose and                    
          claims 8-11 as being unpatentable over Fuller in view of Ray                
          are affirmed.                                                               














                                          16                                          





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007