THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte STEPHEN R. CULLEN
________________
Appeal No. 96-4004
Application 08/342,6031
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, FRANKFORT,
STAAB and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 10
through 18, all of the claims pending in the application.
Application for patent filed November 21, 1994.1
According to appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application, 07/912,873, filed July 13, 1992, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007