THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte SEYMOUR KAPLAN
_____________
Appeal No. 97-0256
Application 08/233,2151
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 3 and 5 through 7, which are the
only claims remaining in this application. Claim 4 has been
Application for patent filed April 25, 1994. According to appellant,1
this application is a continuation of application 07/900,674, filed June 19,
1992, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007