Ex parte LUTHER - Page 6




          Appeal No. 97-0773                                                          
          Application No. 08/101,391                                                  


          proximal end, and an axial bore extending therethrough, as                  
          required by claim 1.  A needle 10 is disposed within the bore of            
          the catheter adjacent the distal end with its sharp end 11                  
          extending outwardly beyond the distal end and its opposite end              
          extending through a slit 33 in the wall of the catheter between             
          the distal end and the proximal end.  As is the case in the                 
          appellant’s invention, intravenous access is gained by means of             
          the sharp end of the needle, which is then withdrawn so that the            
          catheter can be advanced.                                                   
               We agree with the examiner that claim 23 does not                      
          distinguish over Guttman insofar as the “central applications”              
          limitation is concerned.  An object of the Guttman invention is             
          to provide an intravenous catheter “which may be of any desired             
          length” (column 1, lines 39-41), and with regard to the                     
          embodiment of Figure 5 the patentee states in column 2, lines 62-           
          65 that                                                                     
               [t]his embodiment of this invention allows the                         
               insertion of a catheter of any length desired.  The                    
               length of the catheter is no longer limited by the                     
               stylet 10 or other device used to insert it.                           
          From our perspective, this would have indicated to one of                   
          ordinary skill in the art that the Guttman catheter is not                  
          limited to peripheral applications, as argued by the appellant,             
          but also is capable of being used in applications wherein a                 
                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007